Eupraxsophy

Secular humanist, freethinker, progressive, and bibliophile. I love living life, learning things, and meeting people.

I have often been accused of self-indulgence, namely of acting like a know-it-all and being arrogant about my intelligence. And in many cases, those criticisms are valid. I try to be modest and reserved for the most part, but I know I can try too hard to be the smart one in any given clique (not to mention online, especially Facebook).

What most people don’t know is that I only act that way to shore up my self-esteem. My mind is all I have. I’m not good looking, fit, or particularly talented. Indeed, at best, I’d be lucky to be baseline competent at even the most basic tasks. And when you wrap mediocre package up with anxiety, OCD, and depression, you can see I don’t have much going for me.

And honestly, that’s okay, because I’ve come to terms with these things for the most part. But that’s why I try to harness my intelligence. Reading, retaining information, and writing are all I’m good at, and even then, I frankly don’t think I’m exceptionally intelligent (and no, I’m not saying that to fish for compliments to the contrary).

In a weird way, I wish some people knew my true motives and realized I’m not trying to act better than them. Indeed, it’s because I think I’m not better than most people that I act this way. But it’s best I keep such realities a secret. People seem to prefer an arrogant smart alec to a depressed person. 

For the record, I’m not really sad or anything right now. I’m just reflecting. 

Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

Ernest Hemingway 

I can totally relate to this, and I’m sure I’m not alone. Physical beauty is one thing, but an exceptional mind is far more deep and engaging (not to mention more deserving of love, in my opinion). 

I can totally relate to this, and I’m sure I’m not alone. Physical beauty is one thing, but an exceptional mind is far more deep and engaging (not to mention more deserving of love, in my opinion). 

Indeed, intelligence is not some catch-all distinction: there are different kinds of intelligence. An athlete is smart in sports, a scientist in science, etc. We all have different strengths and expertise. Never feel worthless for not being good at one thing.
Heck, don’t feel worthless if you’re not good at most things. As long as you have at least one talent that makes you feel good, and serves some meaning you life or others, you should be content. 

Indeed, intelligence is not some catch-all distinction: there are different kinds of intelligence. An athlete is smart in sports, a scientist in science, etc. We all have different strengths and expertise. Never feel worthless for not being good at one thing.

Heck, don’t feel worthless if you’re not good at most things. As long as you have at least one talent that makes you feel good, and serves some meaning you life or others, you should be content. 

(Source: cloudedcastles, via broken-threads-deactivated20120)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge

Charles Darwin 

Also look at the Dunning-Kruger Effect for a similar problem: smart people are more introspective and thus more likely to second-guess themselves. But less intelligent people, by nature of their lack of critical analysis, are oblivious to their own short-comings…and thus more confident. 

Also look at the Dunning-Kruger Effect for a similar problem: smart people are more introspective and thus more likely to second-guess themselves. But less intelligent people, by nature of their lack of critical analysis, are oblivious to their own short-comings…and thus more confident.